Evaluation Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words - 5

Evaluation - Essay Example It does not disappoint in terms of its usability and mobility. Once a user is on the homepage, everything is well illustrated to direct him or her to the next step. Grammarly.com places much emphasis as to why it is the world’s best grammar checker. It goes ahead to outline ten reasons why its users will love it. It also employs the inverted pyramid principle of relaying information. The site emphasizes on correcting grammatical errors as its main service, then continues to outline at the bottom that it is also a plagiarism checker. Such an organized layout ensures that the homepage captures the important information to convince its users as to why they should proceed to use it. The site achieves a convincing value-proposition from the layout and inverted pyramid structure of information. The site also recognizes the value of social media as a platform for online exposure. It is integrated with Twitter (38,000 followers), Facebook (3 million likes) and Google (1.7 million). The website covers all the aspects of a good web design. In addition, the homepage includes some of the users’ testimonials. New users would be convinced to use the services offered when they get to read the feedback of previous users. However, the website has some few negative aspects. Firstly, the homepage has lots of information that the users might not get to read all of it. Secondly, the website is too simple; that is, it has concentrated too much on the ‘Keep It Simple Stupid’ impression. It has limited its target group to students only, locking out the corporate

Employment Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words - 7

Employment Law - Essay Example 38). The Agency Workers Regulations 2010 is founded on the principle of equal treatment to agency workers, in comparison to employees. The entitlement to equal treatment is restricted to fundamental employment and working conditions, like rest breaks and pay and not to protection from unfair dismissal and other such statutory rights (Agency Worker Regulations 2010 – a missed opportunity?, 2010). In order to advice Erica, the Human Resource Director of the Cranford Computers Ltd, with regard to Shirley; the major issue to be considered is whether Shirley’s frequent absence from work, on health grounds, is permitted by the employment legislation. It is also to be examined, whether the Cranford Computers Ltd, is in breach of the provisions of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974. As an employee of Cranford Computers Ltd, for 2 years, Shirley is entitled to rights under the Employment Rights Act 1996. The time off rights of the Employment Protection Act 1975 (Employment Protection Act , 1975) were incorporated in the Employment Rights Act 1996. Some of these grant employees paid time off, whilst others permit unpaid time off. Section 50(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, specifies that the duration of time off and related conditions to be reasonable (Employment Rights Act , 1996). In our problem, Julie, who was one of Shirley’s colleagues covering her absences, had protested at having to shoulder Shirley’s duties frequently. Julie had also demanded additional remuneration for this work, entailing additional costs for the employer. Whilst taking decisions in respect of Shirley’s absence, these factors have to be taken into consideration by Cranford Computers Ltd. With regard to Julie, there is no legal entitlement for working overtime. Furthermore, there is no specification regarding overtime pay and the only requirement is that the average pay should not be less than the National Minimum Wage. However, no worker